Arraywrite pbp3
![arraywrite pbp3 arraywrite pbp3](https://www.nutsvolts.com/uploads/wygwam/NV_0519_Holler_Figure02.jpg)
Micromite backpacks are very useful and make a lot of projects very easy Īs usual it's about context Dave. (Not sure what CAD means nowadays, in my days it meant Computer aided Drawing/Draughting but I think that now it means Computer Aided Design, hey ho). And by using Visual Basic for Applications one can write a programme, see the results and get an automatic CAD output. Robert G8RPI (the RPI was issued at random back in 1978, nothing to do wth Raspberrys)Īnother useful programing language/aid is Excel. Python on a RPi4 will be faster than Basic on a 4MHz PIC!ĭo look at PBP3 though, there is a free verson for hobbyists and you are not tied to specific hardware (the free version only works with a limited, but useful selection of PICs) It is also not fair to compare languages for the change wheel program unless they were all run on the same hardware. Were I'd used a internal UART They were bit banging the serial! Long story short the production units used my code. So with prototyping done it was handed to the "proper" programmers some ime later they came back asking for more memory! They were using a C compiler costing a lot more than PBP bu, amonst other issues, were not accessing the hardware features of the chip.
#Arraywrite pbp3 serial#
I once wrote PBP code to drive a prototype machine that had two DC motors, a stepper and a serial interface. I'm no programmer but have used PBP for hobby and commercial applications. I use one, PBP3 (Pic Basic Pro 3.)This as you might expect runs on a PIC. SOD said " Compared with C, BASIC takes up more memory, runs slowly and has weak system programming features." and Bazyle said " Basic is interpreted." Neitherof these is strictly true.